This is an extremely powerful tool for audio manipulation, but there are no buttons, sliders, or presets to make it understandable to an average musician. Supposedly, no features are disabled in the unregistered version. Requires System 7.
- make apple my homepage on mac!
- Popular Topics.
Looks like you can download it from Tucows. Read more about it above. This sequencer is still well-known, and if you can find a copy for sale, it makes a good investment. Older versions supporting back to the Mac Plus are available. If a used copy is available that supports your vintage Mac, Cubase is an excellent choice. Super Studio Session is an 8-voice sample-based music tracking package. It worked for me with System 7. I would guess it is probably compatible with System Software up to 7.
The author, Opcode Systems, has gone belly-up.
iMac G5, good for home recording?...
The software is available for download from Presonus. OMS requires at least System 7. Install this first to ease your MIDI setup woes. Try building one.
Buying a Farallon MacRecorder is the obvious solution, but that might be easier said than done. It might be fun to try to build your own by downloading these plans sound-input-device. There are many ways for vintage Macs to help record, edit, and produce music. The entire range of Macs can find a good, useful home for years to come.
Best software for PowerMac G5?
You can have more fun and save money by putting these classics to work. Try it! Your new ABC files can be manipulated with abc4mac.
Low End Mac is funded primarily through donations. Ask a question. User profile for user: Desktops Speciality level out of ten: More Less. Reply I have this question too I have this question too Me too Me too. All replies Drop Down menu. Loading page content. Reply Helpful Thread reply - more options Link to this Post.
Jan Hedlund Jan Hedlund. The majority of plug-ins are finally becoming available for Mac OS X, though not always in Audio Units versions that can be used directly within Logic and other AU-reliant programs. Mike Cameron Having explained that benchmark figures shouldn't become the only thing to rely on when choosing a computer, I was naturally interested to obtain some quantitative results running music applications.
To provide a sensible track count figure, I've decided to quote the number of mono playback tracks at bit, Using the primary internal drives in both cases, my G4 MHz ran up to around 40 tracks and the G5 80 tracks at this nominal 50 percent capacity; placing an edit across all the tracks increased disk load by around 10 percent. A further panel made of moulded plastic helps to direct the flow of air from the cooling fans Mike Cameron Musicians often compare the CPU muscle of different systems by seeing how many reverb plug-ins they can run before the activity 'LED' goes into the red, and I decided to run this test using Emagic's new Space Designer sampling reverb.
Like all convolving algorithms this is a pretty CPU-intensive plug-in, and using a patch with a two-second decay time, a mere two Space Designers registered around 95 percent CPU load on my G4. With the same patch, the G5 ran 32 instances! The CPU activity meter readings seemed fairly accurate, because loading on a couple more instances on the G5 pushed it over the edge, and lengthening the decay time on the G4 instances by a few percent brought the system to a halt.
The extreme discrepancy in performance in this case is probably due in part to the fact that Space Designer is one of few applications currently optimised for the G5. The G5's superior memory bandwidth, as well as its greater CPU horsepower, should be noticeable with applications such as soft samplers, so I decided to compare the maximum polyphony using a RAM-based program rather than samples streamed from hard drive in Emagic's EXS There was an obvious improvement, but nothing like as great as with Space Designer; my G4 just managed voices, while the G5 delivered around to voices.
Additional drives and memory can be installed without the need for any tools. Mike Cameron From these tests, it seems that the performance gains vary depending on the area you test. For example, scaling up my G4 MHz EXS24 sampler polyphony to what you might expect on a 2GHz G4 machine if there was such a thing shows that the increase in EXS24 polyphony offered by the G5 is pretty much in line with its faster clock speed, with few obvious benefits from the second processor or faster bussing.
On the other hand, the increase in the number of Space Designer reverbs that can be run simultaneously can't be accounted for by clock speed alone, so the G5's architecture clearly offers significant advantages where plug-ins are designed to take advantage of it. This also suggests that for most real-world projects, creating an audio partition on the existing internal hard drive should deliver more than enough performance — and if it doesn't, adding a second Serial ATA drive and using software RAID to stripe data across them will deliver many more tracks.
Logic and the G5 make short work of 87 tracks of audio Computers are relatively inexpensive considering what they can do, and they offer tremendous power and creative potential, but in no way can they ever be considered an investment other than in the amount of work they can do for you during the time you own them.
Fast though the G5 is, you just know that in two or three years' time, you'll be wondering how to fund the upgrade to Apple's new gleaming, ultraviolet, pyramid-shaped G6 or the G7 levitating silver sphere. Computing power continues to double every 18 months or so in accordance with Moore's Law, which means obsolescence is an unavoidable part of buying into any computer platform, but having said that, the G5 represents a very big jump in performance for most users. Not only does the G5 provide Mac users with a very significant power hike, it is also very cheap for what it delivers.
Home - Music Tribe Community
Even the top dual-processor model costs around 30 percent less than my old Mac SE30 with its monochrome 9-inch screen, 20MB hard drive and 4MB of memory cost me in the mid-'80s! The ability to support up to 8GB of RAM is good news for those using large sample libraries, and the faster internal drives should increase the number of available audio tracks. DVD and CD-R burning is built in, so there are no backup problems and the only restriction, if this still applies to you, is that you no longer have the option to run 'proper' OS 9.
Classic Mode is included, of course, but although this runs OS 9 word processors and so on, it's useless for most music applications. There's also the issue of the 3. Nevertheless, the G5 definitely has that 'I must possess it! In all three G5 machines, however, only cards that use 3. Most of the major companies manufacturing Mac soundcards have now either updated their products or announced details of forthcoming upgrades:. Mike Cameron Few products have been hyped as much as Apple's new G5 range of bit personal computers — but how good are they for making and recording music in the real world?
Mike Cameron Gee Up When I turned on the G5 for the first time, I was particularly interested in how noisy it would be in my own studio, as I'd previously only seen them at trade shows where the ambient noise level is fairly high. Most of the major companies manufacturing Mac soundcards have now either updated their products or announced details of forthcoming upgrades: They have also announced an upgrade plan for users with older cards who are migrating to a G5.
The cards being updated are the Audiophile and Deltas 44, 66, and LT, and the company promises that the new versions being introduced will be fully backwards-compatible with the old PCI standard and with all Windows machines. For details, see http: